Skip to main content

Strength and Weakness

Each time I have had a discussion on strengths and weaknesses, the question I have been asked or faced with is should I work on my weak areas or areas of strength. Conventional wisdom states the former, but over the last few years the view has veered towards the latter. Certain weaknesses are "fatal flaws", but other than that I believe that working on your strengths are far more rewarding in the long run.

I cant think of a better example than sports. And in particular, this story comes to mind. The story of the one armed boy who learnt judo.

But think about it. Think of how Virender Sehwag would have felt when he was drafted into the Indian cricket team to partner with a certain Sachin Tendulkar. It is a different matter altogether that not too many people have as de-cluttered a mind as Sehwag (read this interview of his), but any other person in his place would have worried about how they can ever keep pace with Tendulkar.

So, if you were Sehwag and you were in the team where a certain Tendulkar was already there, what would you do? Remember your goal is to maintain your place in the team and perhaps carve a name for yourself.

There are two options - one, try to fit in the great mans shoes and second - do your own thing.

Most people when they move into a job or position where the outgoing position was held by someone successful make the mistake of doing the former. They try to fit in their predecessors shoes. And that is always a losing proposition - the comparisons are inevitable and it is a slippery slope into oblivion.

And when faced with that situation, remember Sehwag and Tendulkar. You can never out-Tendulkar a Tendulkar. You can only out-Sehwag a Tendulkar. Take any situation (industry, movies, sports, wherever) where a reigning champion has been dethroned - it happens only because the incumbent has used a different approach and that approach has to be based on the incumbents strengths.

Therefore, it is always smarter to focus on ones strengths rather than papering over so called weaknesses giving you an "all-rounder" who is good at a few things, but not great at anything.

So, hone your strengths like crazy!
Labels:

Comments

  1. KoushiksMarch 27, 2012 at 10:35 AM

    Neel , the entire Gallup Strengths Finder is based on this premise of honing your strengths..makes a very good read and recommend that you take the evaluation as well...

    ReplyDelete
  2. NeelearningMarch 28, 2012 at 7:08 AM

    Yes, thats a good book to go by :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Be Civil. Make nice!

Popular posts from this blog

The man who saved Pumpelsdrop

This was a story we had in college if I am not mistaken. Perhaps it was in school, but a delightful story it was. The story goes somewhat like this ( reproduced from here ), but the college version we had was slightly different from this.  I t was a dull, gloomy and a depressing morning in a town named Pumpelsdrop in northern England. The Great Depression had brought all the businesses to a standstill. The bored automobile dealer was spending time alone, as usual. But, this seems to be an unusual morning as an odd entity (customer) appeared on the horizon. A man in a bright suit walks up to the dealer and says, "I need to buy a Rolls Royce Phantom II. We have a business conference coming up and I need to impress my customers". Then proceeds to pay 10% of the deal with a single check for 2000 pounds. The rest he says will pay when he takes the delivery.   The auto dealer was stunned. He was delighted to hear that someone is holding a business conference of some kind and ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Zero to One

Zero to One by Peter Thiel is a nice read. (Yes - if I sit down to write a book review - the book has to be worth it - and usually good - so most of my book reviews are about good books.You can stop here if that's the information you seek.) Where this book scores is in contrarian thoughts and contrarian questions that make you think. It starts with a four big lessons learned from the 90s dot-com crash that is, Make incremental advances, Stay lean and flexible, Improve on the competition and Focus on product, not sales. Just as you warm up to it, he says, the opposite rules are more correct - which are: It is better to risk boldness than triviality. A bad plan is better than no plan. Competitive markets destroy profits. Sales matters just as much as products. And finally leaves with a simple definition of contrarianism - it is not to oppose the crowd (or follow a smaller or newer or older crowd) but to think for yourself. "All happy companies are different"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Anti networking year

I dont usually go out of my way to network. But over the last few years, I ensured that I spend some time creating new connections. It is a small fragment of my time that goes into it, but what I realised was that some of those networking events were not really working out. I also took time to post about the things I do (mostly on Linkedin) and here (nobody reads this - this is more of a note to myself).  It seemed to be the same set of people saying the same set of things. So, this year I have decided to step back.  Unless it is a truly unique event, I wont be going to any event - and thats how the unconference happened.  Unless it is a really significant update, I wont be posting about it.  And spend time creating and doing the things I like to do. Perhaps read more. Or write more. It is April now and I have done well so far.  Managed to read a few books. Actively working on a few creations. And then some. Lets see.  So for all I know, I might write less ...
Post a Comment
Read more