Skip to main content

Future of L&D - a continuing series

 I recently read a report on the future of l&d and I must I am disappointed. To sum up, here were the broad points. 

Digital learning will grow: 

My take: Yes, but getting access to good content is more and more difficult. Companies want to sell you a billion licences. Employees want learning only at the point where they need it and dont want to waste time searching through dozens on videos, learning and unlearning digital frameworks. So, digital learning will grow - but where is the quality? 

In future I hope, Digital learning is relevant, shorter (minus the preambles), crisp and very very context specific. I personally think companies are better off investing in making their own content especially if the content has to be repeated - standard frameworks, relevant to the values and so on. 

L&D will be key to talent retention:

My take: Not in India. Not in tech. I cant think where else. L&D was never and is never the key to talent retention, except in L&D itself. Companies have tried this by sending people off to expensive programs. and they work (yes, think Stanford, ISB), but almost anything lesser  - people hardly want it. Smart people want money, growth, work on something important for the company etc. Where is L&D here?

L&D will be a priority for employees:

My take: I hope, but I dont think so. Not in places which are hustle driven, which are racing against the clock. Other than that, people want learning at the point where they need it and unless you show them "so what" after the learning, it will never be priority.

Platforms for onboarding: Yes - this one works.

New tech will be impactful: No. I have not seen this work at all. There are so many distractions for the employees - from work to social media - quite impossible for anyone but the most determined employee to learn continuously from any sort of course. Nobody seems to have time.

Companies will spend on L&D: Yes

In summary - many of these predictions are exactly what we saw 10 years earlier. What is new? And in that case, what are we missing? 

Future of L&D seems to be written by the content providers, creators and those who are interested in selling. If you ask employees, any employee their answer will be different. I see usage patterns of people signed up for online course - their data seems rather different from "future of L&D" predicts.

This is from one report - will add more in other posts as I read more reports. 

Disclaimer: Work in progress...


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The man who saved Pumpelsdrop

This was a story we had in college if I am not mistaken. Perhaps it was in school, but a delightful story it was. The story goes somewhat like this ( reproduced from here ), but the college version we had was slightly different from this.  I t was a dull, gloomy and a depressing morning in a town named Pumpelsdrop in northern England. The Great Depression had brought all the businesses to a standstill. The bored automobile dealer was spending time alone, as usual. But, this seems to be an unusual morning as an odd entity (customer) appeared on the horizon. A man in a bright suit walks up to the dealer and says, "I need to buy a Rolls Royce Phantom II. We have a business conference coming up and I need to impress my customers". Then proceeds to pay 10% of the deal with a single check for 2000 pounds. The rest he says will pay when he takes the delivery.   The auto dealer was stunned. He was delighted to hear that someone is holding a business conference of some kind and ...

Zero to One

Zero to One by Peter Thiel is a nice read. (Yes - if I sit down to write a book review - the book has to be worth it - and usually good - so most of my book reviews are about good books.You can stop here if that's the information you seek.) Where this book scores is in contrarian thoughts and contrarian questions that make you think. It starts with a four big lessons learned from the 90s dot-com crash that is, Make incremental advances, Stay lean and flexible, Improve on the competition and Focus on product, not sales. Just as you warm up to it, he says, the opposite rules are more correct - which are: It is better to risk boldness than triviality. A bad plan is better than no plan. Competitive markets destroy profits. Sales matters just as much as products. And finally leaves with a simple definition of contrarianism - it is not to oppose the crowd (or follow a smaller or newer or older crowd) but to think for yourself. "All happy companies are different"...

Playing to win

This bright green book with a yellow title has always caught my attention, but I had never read it.  Imagine my surprise that when I finally picked it up as part of a preparation for a workshop that it was such a fantastic book. Playing to win by Alan Lafley and Roger Martin is one of those books that is up there when it comes to learning about how strategy can be crafted and implemented in real business. There is much in the book - and unlike other books - this book is really a leaf out of P&G, but with frameworks and models that can be applied anywhere. Image from here . It is these 5 questions played in a loop (well, iteratively) that are the juiciest part of the book and as simple and obvious as they are, it is this place where the strategy play happens. So, yes, simply put a great book to be read by anyone who is anywhere close to strategy...