Skip to main content

On washing machines, users and designers

We upgraded our washing machine. After nearly a decade and a half or thereabouts. For good measure, we purchased the same brand and roughly the same capacity - since, well, we were used to the machine and as change averse as we are when it comes to washing clothes, we decided to stick to the brand. But little did we realise that the world has changed. From simple washing machines to fuzzy washing machines - nowadays they also use AI and IoT - to wash clothes. I think by the time the next generation of machines hit the market, we will have to offer it crypto coins, biometric scanners and use blockchain to identify the clothes and modes. 

Jokes apart, after using it for a few days, I am fairly convinced, washing machine designers do not use the washing machines they designed. 

The washing machine does not allow me to put wet clothes into it. Why do I put wet clothes, you ask? (Because I am a user and I have my quirks). But rational explanation - Some times clothes need to be scrubbed before it goes into the machine - especially children's clothes that are dirty. But the moment we do that, the machine decides to throw the soap water away. [This did not exist in the earlier machine - but somewhere along the way an intelligent designer added this feature] Many Indian users scrub their soiled clothes because the washing machine never washes them properly (but like I said, no washing machine designer uses their own washing machines). 

Then, after discarding the water, the machine does an elaborate calibration exercise of checking the weight. I don't know what it accomplishes with this - yes of course, it needs to figure out via artificial intelligence how much water is needed - but I just prefer the normal/usual mode (more on this later). And no, I can't override that. 

The human hack I have figured is after the washing machine weighs my clothes and starts to function, I pause it and dump the clothes and the soap water into it thoroughly confusing it. And it reluctantly accepts its fate and continues. AI - 0, Human - 1

My older washing machine had 6 modes. This one has 8. But I have used exactly 1 mode over 15 years. One. That really is all I need. The water saver, normal washing mode that washes once, rinses once and dries once. Everything else is features I don't need. But somebody had to create useless features and since the designers and bosses never use washing machines, they did not realise it is useless. This one has jeans, wool, gentle, thunderstorm, extra terrestrial modes. 

The newer washing machine has an app (yes, a mobile app) that talks to the wifi (yes, wifi) to convey to us in case something is wrong in the machine - . Who thinks this is a feature? Why will I, starved for entertainment, watch my washing machine wash using wifi? And then use an app to troubleshoot it? Any user will first call the service center "My washing machine is not working". If anything this required a simple SMS to the service platform. But no, the bosses have to be impressed.  Instead of communicating to the user who is in the same house, it will use wifi to talk to the user who has to have installed the app in the first place. 

And then the lint filter - which was functioning perfectly till the point we thought who needs a lint filter? But no, they had to take what is working perfectly and replace it with a glowing plastic filter that somehow, magically creates more lint and adds to our clothes like an additional layer. Free lint available!

And for some reason, they have changed all the notification sounds, the pause button functionality and confused the hell out of us. And yet, after all this, the clothes were washed better in the older model. 

Now, I am not being a Luddite here, but I wish washing machine designers spent more time with users and their challenges before adding useless features and making it more difficult (as opposed to more useful). 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Be Civil. Make nice!

Popular posts from this blog

The man who saved Pumpelsdrop

This was a story we had in college if I am not mistaken. Perhaps it was in school, but a delightful story it was. The story goes somewhat like this ( reproduced from here ), but the college version we had was slightly different from this.  I t was a dull, gloomy and a depressing morning in a town named Pumpelsdrop in northern England. The Great Depression had brought all the businesses to a standstill. The bored automobile dealer was spending time alone, as usual. But, this seems to be an unusual morning as an odd entity (customer) appeared on the horizon. A man in a bright suit walks up to the dealer and says, "I need to buy a Rolls Royce Phantom II. We have a business conference coming up and I need to impress my customers". Then proceeds to pay 10% of the deal with a single check for 2000 pounds. The rest he says will pay when he takes the delivery.   The auto dealer was stunned. He was delighted to hear that someone is holding a business conference of some kind and ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Zero to One

Zero to One by Peter Thiel is a nice read. (Yes - if I sit down to write a book review - the book has to be worth it - and usually good - so most of my book reviews are about good books.You can stop here if that's the information you seek.) Where this book scores is in contrarian thoughts and contrarian questions that make you think. It starts with a four big lessons learned from the 90s dot-com crash that is, Make incremental advances, Stay lean and flexible, Improve on the competition and Focus on product, not sales. Just as you warm up to it, he says, the opposite rules are more correct - which are: It is better to risk boldness than triviality. A bad plan is better than no plan. Competitive markets destroy profits. Sales matters just as much as products. And finally leaves with a simple definition of contrarianism - it is not to oppose the crowd (or follow a smaller or newer or older crowd) but to think for yourself. "All happy companies are different"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Staying contemporary II

So, if that is not the way to training people on customer service what is? I have not crystallized on an idea right away, but there are some formative thoughts. But more than that, as a trainer, it is important that a training deliver cutting edge stuff to you. Especially when it comes to senior managers. Usually companies have a culture of service (by and large) - when you train frontline management it is important that we reinforce the culture (how do you do it - therein lies a later post). But as you go higher up, what does one do? What do they expect out of it? What can we give them that we already dont know? Most senior managers would be well read in those usual suspects - the HBRs, the McKinseys and other magazines. So, giving them anything out of any of these publications would be a waste of time for them. And mind you, most of these publications are not necessarily ahead of the curve as much as they are on the curve. So, what constitutes your trainings? How do you get them?...
3 comments
Read more