Skip to main content

The theory of supply and demand

Every market is driven by supply and demand. In general the supply is there to satisfy the demand. For most mature markets, demand drives supply. Greater the demand, greater is the supply. So, in general if you find a supply side gap, the gap can be mapped to a demand side gap.

The exception is when a new industry/service/product is being created - where the demand is created towards something new. This is a tough path to go forward on because creating new demand means educating customers, showing them something new/different/valuable/insightful and so on - and enabling them to see the value out of this new product.

The LnD role is generally a risk averse role - rather the people who run it go after client needs and if the needs are not met - there is a ripple effect. Either they are perceived as incapable or out of touch with business needs or something to that effect. So, LnD typically toes the line of what business wants. And usually businesses are clear on what they want and often on how they want it as well - because they need minimum disruption to the business and maximum clarity. And of course, budgets and timelines.

Given all these constraints and budget constraints the ability of the LnD to go beyond currently defined boxes into new boxes is difficult. And thus the market remains in a state of supply and demand equilibrium. Almost anything new - by its very nature will cost. And cost higher than usual solutions.

Want better content? Pay for it.
Want a better tech driven experience? Pay for it.
Want superior facilitation? Pay for it.
Want board game simulations? Pay for it.
Want to make something sticky? Well, it takes time and effort.
Want something really deep? It takes expertise
Want culture change? All of the above

And it is smarter to stick to people and companies who have delivered - after all why risk burning fingers with something new when returns arent clear and risk is high? And as a provider, you need to be able to justify the additional cost by promising additional returns. And sometimes that additional delta is not visible. Thus the world is stuck with a lot of things that are replicas of each other.

What is the way out? The way for a service provider to find one early adapter to try their ideas on. It may be easier said than done, but this the way to carve out a niche in the market. The way for an LnD leader is to find one business head who is willing to stick her neck out for something outside the box. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The man who saved Pumpelsdrop

This was a story we had in college if I am not mistaken. Perhaps it was in school, but a delightful story it was. The story goes somewhat like this ( reproduced from here ), but the college version we had was slightly different from this.  I t was a dull, gloomy and a depressing morning in a town named Pumpelsdrop in northern England. The Great Depression had brought all the businesses to a standstill. The bored automobile dealer was spending time alone, as usual. But, this seems to be an unusual morning as an odd entity (customer) appeared on the horizon. A man in a bright suit walks up to the dealer and says, "I need to buy a Rolls Royce Phantom II. We have a business conference coming up and I need to impress my customers". Then proceeds to pay 10% of the deal with a single check for 2000 pounds. The rest he says will pay when he takes the delivery.   The auto dealer was stunned. He was delighted to hear that someone is holding a business conference of some kind and ...

Zero to One

Zero to One by Peter Thiel is a nice read. (Yes - if I sit down to write a book review - the book has to be worth it - and usually good - so most of my book reviews are about good books.You can stop here if that's the information you seek.) Where this book scores is in contrarian thoughts and contrarian questions that make you think. It starts with a four big lessons learned from the 90s dot-com crash that is, Make incremental advances, Stay lean and flexible, Improve on the competition and Focus on product, not sales. Just as you warm up to it, he says, the opposite rules are more correct - which are: It is better to risk boldness than triviality. A bad plan is better than no plan. Competitive markets destroy profits. Sales matters just as much as products. And finally leaves with a simple definition of contrarianism - it is not to oppose the crowd (or follow a smaller or newer or older crowd) but to think for yourself. "All happy companies are different"...

Playing to win

This bright green book with a yellow title has always caught my attention, but I had never read it.  Imagine my surprise that when I finally picked it up as part of a preparation for a workshop that it was such a fantastic book. Playing to win by Alan Lafley and Roger Martin is one of those books that is up there when it comes to learning about how strategy can be crafted and implemented in real business. There is much in the book - and unlike other books - this book is really a leaf out of P&G, but with frameworks and models that can be applied anywhere. Image from here . It is these 5 questions played in a loop (well, iteratively) that are the juiciest part of the book and as simple and obvious as they are, it is this place where the strategy play happens. So, yes, simply put a great book to be read by anyone who is anywhere close to strategy...