Skip to main content

On Teachers

During my random survey with my friends on the teachers they have encountered through school or college, my findings have generally been similar. Over the course of the entire school and college, we would have typically encountered no less than 100 teachers, if not more. The real figure is closer to 200, if you were among those who went to coaching classes and tuitions. And yet if you ask them how many teachers they remember from their school or college days (for what they taught), most of the answers are in single digits.

Think about it. Barely 5-10 percent of your teachers are "good" - that you remember them 15-20 years later. It's a travesty is it not? That the nearly 15 to 18 odd years we spend studying, we barely remember a few teachers.

So, here is the story of one such teacher who has left an everlasting impression in my mind.

Metallurgy, as a subject, to those who do not know about it, can be interesting as watching paint dry. And that in essence is what great teachers are about. They can bring about even the driest subject to life - and it goes without saying that the opposite is true for bad teachers.

So this professor walks into the first day of Metallurgy class in second year engineering and asks us "What have you heard about this subject?"
And one of us, replies "We have heard that it is a boring subject"
And he replies, with supreme confidence in his usual unflappable self that we came to associate with him over time "I will prove to you that Metallurgy is an interesting subject. I would have failed in my job if you go back thinking that this is a boring subject."

Over a semester, prove he did. His passion for the subject was evident as was his deep knowledge (is one possible without the other?). He managed to transfer this passion to a few of the students. Whatever else he did, he managed to have good attendance in his class (notorious as engineering students are, this was a big achievement).

So what made him a great teacher? His passion in the subject. His ability to transfer this passion to his students. His ability to "pull" students into the subject. And the way he taught, undoubtedly. He was sharp, no doubt. Post engineering I sold many of my books, but the metallurgy one still remains with me.

The man himself went on to become a great storyteller. CPN was what we called him - Narayan Parasuram is his name. And I am sure you would have heard of the company he created...Karadi tales. I am honoured to have been taught metallurgy by him. Hats off to you Sir.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The man who saved Pumpelsdrop

This was a story we had in college if I am not mistaken. Perhaps it was in school, but a delightful story it was. The story goes somewhat like this ( reproduced from here ), but the college version we had was slightly different from this.  I t was a dull, gloomy and a depressing morning in a town named Pumpelsdrop in northern England. The Great Depression had brought all the businesses to a standstill. The bored automobile dealer was spending time alone, as usual. But, this seems to be an unusual morning as an odd entity (customer) appeared on the horizon. A man in a bright suit walks up to the dealer and says, "I need to buy a Rolls Royce Phantom II. We have a business conference coming up and I need to impress my customers". Then proceeds to pay 10% of the deal with a single check for 2000 pounds. The rest he says will pay when he takes the delivery.   The auto dealer was stunned. He was delighted to hear that someone is holding a business conference of some kind and ...

Zero to One

Zero to One by Peter Thiel is a nice read. (Yes - if I sit down to write a book review - the book has to be worth it - and usually good - so most of my book reviews are about good books.You can stop here if that's the information you seek.) Where this book scores is in contrarian thoughts and contrarian questions that make you think. It starts with a four big lessons learned from the 90s dot-com crash that is, Make incremental advances, Stay lean and flexible, Improve on the competition and Focus on product, not sales. Just as you warm up to it, he says, the opposite rules are more correct - which are: It is better to risk boldness than triviality. A bad plan is better than no plan. Competitive markets destroy profits. Sales matters just as much as products. And finally leaves with a simple definition of contrarianism - it is not to oppose the crowd (or follow a smaller or newer or older crowd) but to think for yourself. "All happy companies are different"...

Playing to win

This bright green book with a yellow title has always caught my attention, but I had never read it.  Imagine my surprise that when I finally picked it up as part of a preparation for a workshop that it was such a fantastic book. Playing to win by Alan Lafley and Roger Martin is one of those books that is up there when it comes to learning about how strategy can be crafted and implemented in real business. There is much in the book - and unlike other books - this book is really a leaf out of P&G, but with frameworks and models that can be applied anywhere. Image from here . It is these 5 questions played in a loop (well, iteratively) that are the juiciest part of the book and as simple and obvious as they are, it is this place where the strategy play happens. So, yes, simply put a great book to be read by anyone who is anywhere close to strategy...