Skip to main content

The Professor and The Trainer

Recently, I had to chance to attend a session on "Strategy" by two people. Let us call them Professor and Trainer.  (No, the ending is not what you think it is)

The Professor had a lively interactive discussion - as did the Trainer.
The Professor spoke for the same time as the trainer - but the Trainer was more interactive, had exercises for us to complete and had reading material.
The Professor spoke about experiences from his work and around the world including historical examples- the Trainer spoke about data points around the world.
The Professor was not the most suave, articulate - the Trainer got all his accents right and could speak like a dream.

So, whose talk do you think we enjoyed?

If you thought that we enjoyed the Trainer, you got it wrong. The Professor beat the Trainer by a wide wide margin.

And therein lies an important lesson for me. That is about understanding the audience.

Sometimes, we focus on making trainings interactive, lively, fill it up with valid data and interesting snippets, but much of that information is public. I mean, if all your talk about strategy is about the usual suspects (Refer my post on customer service), then why do I need a trainer or a professor?

With the spread of the internet, anything that you can get by googling (esp the first page of google) - the chances that your audience can get the same information is as high. Or if you are using the same data points that are available and/or evident to everybody, there is no point.

What you have to say has to be thought-provoking, insightful and create wow moments for your audience along these lines (not the font of the ppt or colour or your accent).

And in this case, the Professor was able to do that far better than the Trainer.  Simply because he gave us more insight and sparked many more "Idea" moments in our brain.

As someone who runs trainings, understanding the audience better will help us create more of those moments. I am not saying knowledge can be substituted (thats a given), but the important realization is that all that jazz in making trainings interactive is useless unless there is substance. As a former boss of mine used to say, "There is no icing without cake".
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Be Civil. Make nice!

Popular posts from this blog

The man who saved Pumpelsdrop

This was a story we had in college if I am not mistaken. Perhaps it was in school, but a delightful story it was. The story goes somewhat like this ( reproduced from here ), but the college version we had was slightly different from this.  I t was a dull, gloomy and a depressing morning in a town named Pumpelsdrop in northern England. The Great Depression had brought all the businesses to a standstill. The bored automobile dealer was spending time alone, as usual. But, this seems to be an unusual morning as an odd entity (customer) appeared on the horizon. A man in a bright suit walks up to the dealer and says, "I need to buy a Rolls Royce Phantom II. We have a business conference coming up and I need to impress my customers". Then proceeds to pay 10% of the deal with a single check for 2000 pounds. The rest he says will pay when he takes the delivery.   The auto dealer was stunned. He was delighted to hear that someone is holding a business conference of some kind and ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Zero to One

Zero to One by Peter Thiel is a nice read. (Yes - if I sit down to write a book review - the book has to be worth it - and usually good - so most of my book reviews are about good books.You can stop here if that's the information you seek.) Where this book scores is in contrarian thoughts and contrarian questions that make you think. It starts with a four big lessons learned from the 90s dot-com crash that is, Make incremental advances, Stay lean and flexible, Improve on the competition and Focus on product, not sales. Just as you warm up to it, he says, the opposite rules are more correct - which are: It is better to risk boldness than triviality. A bad plan is better than no plan. Competitive markets destroy profits. Sales matters just as much as products. And finally leaves with a simple definition of contrarianism - it is not to oppose the crowd (or follow a smaller or newer or older crowd) but to think for yourself. "All happy companies are different"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Playing to win

This bright green book with a yellow title has always caught my attention, but I had never read it.  Imagine my surprise that when I finally picked it up as part of a preparation for a workshop that it was such a fantastic book. Playing to win by Alan Lafley and Roger Martin is one of those books that is up there when it comes to learning about how strategy can be crafted and implemented in real business. There is much in the book - and unlike other books - this book is really a leaf out of P&G, but with frameworks and models that can be applied anywhere. Image from here . It is these 5 questions played in a loop (well, iteratively) that are the juiciest part of the book and as simple and obvious as they are, it is this place where the strategy play happens. So, yes, simply put a great book to be read by anyone who is anywhere close to strategy...
Post a Comment
Read more